Disney Play Cupid: 7 Couples They Had to Clean Up

You’d be hard pushed to find a Disney film without a spot of romance, but is the same true of their original stories?

The short answer is yes, but that doesn’t mean that they have the same outcome, or that the romance was a good idea in the first place. Or that it even existed outside someone else’s head.

Regardless, every Disney film needs a loved up couple, dammit, so here is a countdown of seven love affairs (or not) glossed over by the House of Mouse so far.

#7

Bambi and Faline

bambi-adult (1)

From: Bambi

Disney version: Bambi and Faline are cousins and first encounter each other as fawns. They also become playmates, at least until the manly bucks strut on to the scene, after which Bambi decides he has no time for girls and chases her away with a head butt. The reverse is true in adulthood, however, when he chases away any male opponents with his trusty antlers and even battles a pack of vicious dogs to defend his lady love. The two remain together through hell and high water (pretty much literally), and the film ends with a proud Bambi watching over his mate and their new twins.

Salten version: Bambi and Faline are also cousins in this version, and they probably see more of each other than their own mothers. When mating season arrives, they enjoy a teenage-like infatuation that comes to an abrupt halt when Bambi sees his badass of a father wandering about. Becoming a noble and lonely stag is suddenly far more interesting to Bambi, and he responds to Faline’s affection with a non-plussed shrug before wandering off into the bushes and never looking back. He does briefly glimpse her later on with a couple of her fawns, but exactly which ones he fathered is anyone’s guess, and he seems about as interested in finding out as he is hanging around Faline once they have popped their respective cherries. But, to his credit, Faline’s is the only heart he breaks – we never hear about other dalliances with the does.

Romance Verdict: Forest Fling.

Interestingly, Disney glossed over the one night stand and abandoned offspring angle but kept the vaguely incestuous one. Still, the sight of all that wood seems to get people going, as we can see from the next entry:

 

#6

Tarzan and Jane

Tarzan-and-Jane-disney-couples-6011078-494-463

From: Tarzan

Disney version: A pretty zoologist meeting a half-naked jungle warrior was bound to spell romance, and Tarzan and Jane see each other with equal parts fascination and longing. Both are open to new ideas, such as wearing clothes or swinging through jungle vines, and by the end of the film they realise they are both happy living semi-naked among apes and with one respective parent playing gooseberry in their relationship.

Burroughs version: A pretty Victorian lady meeting a half-naked jungle warrior also spells romance, but only within the context of a shipwreck or a rescue. For all her swooning, Jane realises in the cold light of day that Tarzan wouldn’t make the most suitable husband in high society, and instead jumps ship with the more conventional and richer William Clayton, despite Tarzan learning English, how to behave like a gentleman, travelling thousands of miles to find her and getting a hair cut. So we have a classic Sk8er Boi situation, and Jane would no doubt kick herself if she knew that Tarzan was Clayton’s older cousin and therefore the real heir to the estate.

Romance Verdict: Fickle Flirtation

Since the Disney film is about embracing who you are, it’s no surprise that this Jane gives up everything to live with Tarzan, rather than leaving the one person she truly loves because her friends just wouldn’t “get” him. If only our next lady had had the same idea:

#5

Megara and Hercules

Hercules-and-Megara-Meg-in-Hercules-disney-couples-19754553-1067-800From: Hercules

Thought this one would be higher, didn’t you?

Disney version: Meg is likely the first woman Hercules has seen for several years, and she has a special place in his heart as his first real damsel in distress (despite being in cahoots with the Lord of the Underworld). This innocent but caring fish-out-of water is just what the jaded young Meg needs, and in the end she even defies Hades and risks losing her soul to protect him. Admirable, seeing as the last boyfriend she gave up her soul for ran off with the next bimbo, but instead our honourable and loving Hercules surrenders his hard-earned godhood so he can stay with her for the rest of his life. Ahh.

Mythology version: Megara was the daughter of the king of Thebes and was given to Heracles in marriage after he saved the city. We’re not sure if Megara was happy about this because she is barely touched upon in the original myths, but we do know she was distinctly unimpressed by Heracles going on a rampage and killing their two sons. In some variations she was also killed, but in the Apollodorus version she survives and Heracles later marries her off to one of his nephews, feeling he is no longer worthy of her after his little massacre. To be fair, he did it because his jealous stepmother Hera made him do it, but he is reasonable enough to know he was an idiot and perhaps not the best husband material.

Romance verdict: Domestic Derangement.

Let’s be honest – Disney wanted some authenticity in their version of Greek mythology, so out of Heracles’ mortal wives they chose the one who didn’t keep centaur jizzum in a jar. This romance  is also further down the list because the Disney version stops before we get to the family, and Heracles does show some remorse for his actions. Unlike our next Lothario:


#4

Esmeralda and Phoebus

From: The Hunchback of Notre Dame

Disney version: Back chat, back-handers, and an aversion to religious genocide are just some of the things that this pair have in common. After impressing each other in the street with dancing or use of an animal sidekick, Esmeralda and Phoebus are intrigued by one another, and once they realise they would risk their lives to fight for the greater good, they fall into each other’s arms with a passion as hot as the fire consuming all of Paris. Even the friend-zoned Quasimodo can’t deny that they are made for each other, and sadly accepts that the beautiful gypsy chose the guy with the ridiculous blond goatee.

Hugo version: After Phoebus rescues her from Quasimodo’s clutches, the teenage Esmeralda is as smitten as your average boy band fan, and the soldier treats her as such: slightly bemused by her passion but also enjoying the attention. However, he’s not above meeting her for a secret rendezvous and deftly dodging a promise of marriage after the deed’s been done. Before they get this far they are rudely interrupted by Frollo’s knife attack, after which Phoebus completely washes his hands of the gypsy and leaves her to be tried and hanged for his murder, even though he’s clearly alive. Sadly, Esmeralda still doesn’t take the hint that he’s just not that into her, and in a last ditch effort to see him again ends up being captured and executed – to Phoebus’ complete indifference while he gets married to someone else.

Romance verdict: Virginal Victim.

The only way for this romance to work was to show the version Esmeralda saw in her own head. Phoebus backing slowly away was understandable after being stabbed, but by refusing to give evidence that he was, you know, alive, firmly stamped the word “GIT” on to his forehead. Fortunately, our next couple are evenly matched in this department:

#3

Zeus and Hera

Zeus and HeraFrom: Hercules

Disney version: Zeus, a man with impossibly large nipples, and Hera, a woman who would vanish if she stood sideways, are Greek gods who live on Mount Olympus and enjoy throwing lavish parties. The epitome of loving parents, they spend the majority of the film pining for their beloved son Hercules who was stolen and turned mortal by evil forces. Both watch over him from above, with Zeus imparting some much needed advice, and Hera embracing him and spelling out the film’s moral for the audience in case they didn’t get it.

Mythology version: Zeus and Hera’s relationship is equal parts amusing and disturbing, and therefore ripe for its own reality show (no takers as yet). The reason? They are siblings as well as spouses, and so their arguments are twice as vindictive and calculating as those of other car-crash couples. To give an example, Zeus spends most of his time fathering illegitimate children, and so Hera spends her time tormenting said children or sending them on murderous rampages for her own amusement, Heracles in particular. Like any sensible father, Zeus retaliates by suspending his wife from Mount Olympus with anvils hanging from her feet. So not the world’s most exemplary couple, even for Ancient Greece.

Romance Verdict: Incensed Incest (try saying that five times quickly, and without attracting strange looks.)

Cousins getting it on is apparently fine, but Disney draws the line at brother and sister action as well as infanticide and spousal abuse. Our next couple get on a lot better, but their relationship started off more one-sided than most. And by more, I mean completely:

 

#2

Prince Phillip and Princess Aurora

sleeping beauty kissFrom: Sleeping Beauty

Disney version: Despite being betrothed as children, Phillip and Aurora don’t meet until years later when they stumble across each other in the forest (and as we’ve seen, it’s clearly the place for singles to hook up). After a bout of synchronised singing they know it’s meant to be, so who cares about small details like the other person’s name? In any case, Phillip is prepared to battle an evil sorceress and her dragon incarnation to save his love, and fortunately for him, Aurora seems fairly content that he was the one to kiss her and break the evil spell. They presumably marry soon afterwards, because kissing more than one person makes you a total harlot.

Basile version: I’m sure Talia would have also appreciated a kiss from a handsome prince, had she been awake for this and its subsequent follow up. The young girl (age unknown) is found in her unconscious state by a wandering king, and since she is beautiful and offers no resistance, he decides to take the initiative. By the time Talia wakes up, she has somehow given birth to and nursed two twins whose father already has a wife in tow and leaves them in the tower for long stretches of time. When the king finally shows up, the pair conveniently realise they love each other, brushing any shady implications under the carpet, and later marry once the former queen has been dispatched for her evil deeds.

Romance verdict: Retrospective Rape

As loved up as this couple was, this was only the case after the king had deposited his royal seed. Not only that, but there is a rather unpleasant question mark over Talia’s age, as well as that of the king.

With this in mind, you are probably wondering what number 1 is going to be. Before you scroll down the page (or glance downward if you’re on a desktop), consider that up until this point there has been at least some degree of mutual attraction between the couples, so it wasn’t completely off the wall for Disney to forge a romance out of it. For the next entry, it kind of was:

#1

Eric and Ariel

tumblr_ljyuj73wTk1qi67c3o1_1280

From: The Little Mermaid

Disney version: Ariel the mermaid has always had a fascination with humans, and Prince Eric is both dashingly handsome and the first man she sees up close. The rather cynical sea witch spell dictates that for Ariel to remain human and stay near the man she loves, she must make him fall in love with her in three days. No easy task, considering he is equally fascinated by the strange woman who saved him from drowning and doesn’t put two and two together when Ariel lands on his doorstep (although her lack of voice doesn’t help matters). Happily, the two do fall in love, and despite another woman and a few octopus-related setbacks, they are reunited and later married once Ariel’s human status  and voice box have been reconfirmed.

Andersen version: The set up in the original story is the same, but it goes horribly wrong in practically every way possible. The sea witch not only permanently removes her tongue, but her spell makes the mermaid’s legs sheer agony to walk on. The prince wrongly connects his rescuer with a girl from a nearby temple, and when he meets the mermaid, he treats her as an entertaining oddity and makes her sleep on a cushion outside his room like a small dog. For all her charm and beauty, she is always considered second best, and when it looks like the prince will grudgingly cut his losses and go with her anyway, he arranges to marry the girl from the temple after all. Although this would end in death for the mermaid, she refuses her only way out – killing him – and so turns into sea foam the morning after the wedding. She becomes some sort of angel afterwards, but the prince is even more oblivious to her than he was at the beginning of the story, and despite watching the person she loves marry someone else and giving her life for him, the mermaid finds out this counts for precisely bugger all when it comes to karma.

Romance verdict: Hopeless Heartbreak

This is the loudest example of Disney clapping their hands over their ears and singing over the original romance outcome. Given the target audience this is the only possible ending they could have conjured up, but this begs the question as to why they would choose this story anyway.

To avoid ending on a downer (or cynical cackle if that’s what floats your boat), here are two couples that were just as happy in the original as in the Disney films:

Belle and the prince/Belle and the prince

Belle-Prince-beauty-and-the-beast-18557773-960-540

From: Beauty and the Beast

Both beasts would give up their lives or their human forms for Belle, and both Belles realise there is a decent person underneath all the hair and claws.

Aladdin and Jasmine/Aladdin and Badr al Budur

Aladdin_and_Jasmine_Kissing

From: Aladdin

Both Aladdins use the genie to impress the princess and rescue her; both princesses love Aladdin for his streetwise nature or singular bling.

Now, doesn’t that make you feel all warm and fuzzy on the inside?

If you’re not sure, just ask Belle.

Posted in Disney vs. Original | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Hunchback of Notre Dame vs. Notre-Dame de Paris

The 1996 film The Hunchback of Notre Dame saw Disney take more than a few risks with their storytelling. Featuring darker adult topics such as religious genocide and lust, it also toed the line with some pole dancing and the first openly gay Disney character (non-human, but it’s a start). Since this left many people scratching their heads and wondering if a load of pod-people had taken over the company, you could be forgiven for thinking that they had simply stayed true to the source text this time.  As you may have guessed, the only thing more wrong than this answer is Frollo-Esmeralda fan fiction.

The original novel, Notre-Dame de Paris, was written in 1831 by Victor Hugo. If his name rings a bell it’s because he later went on to write the epic Les Misérables, along with various other plays and novels about social and political dissent. This particular novel is set in 15th Century France, and is the story of a deformed bell ringer who falls in love with a beautiful dancer. The idea apparently came to Hugo after seeing a real life hunchback working on the restoration of Notre Dame, and the Greek word  for “fate” carved into the cathedral wall.

The last time this word was carved into anything it didn’t bode well (see Connor: Sarah) so if you were one of those people who was upset that Quasi didn’t get the girl in the end, you might want to turn back now, lest your sanity be lost forever. For everyone else, feel free to bring along some valium and join Esmeralda in praying for the outcast – this one’s going to hurt.

Main Characters

Disney version

Despite being confined to the bell tower his whole life, gentle giant Quasimodo has had exceptional voice coaching as well as access to Simba’s hair stylist. Although his only intellectual discourse comes from a group of stone gargoyles and a religious bigot, he is kind-hearted and wants to see the good in everyone.

Quasimodo’s master, Judge Claude Frollo, is the utter opposite. Everywhere he looks he sees an evil gypsy conspiracy, and feels justified in doing anything to quash it, even murdering innocent people. The fear of eternal damnation is the only thing keeping him in check, but this is soon cast aside for a higher purpose: lust. I’ll let you enjoy that image for a moment.

The object of Frollo’s desire is the smoking hot gypsy woman Esmeralda. As well as giving Jessica Rabbit a run for her money (and with more clothes on), she is willing to stand up for the underdog, and accompanied by her loyal goat Djali, dole out the occasional dose of back chat or a back hander if the city guards overstep their mark.

Esmeralda’s most obvious fan (at least to the audience) is Phoebus, who is the new captain of the guard. Happy to duel with his wits as well as his sword, he starts out under Frollo’s employ but soon defects after witnessing his treatment of gypsies. He too has a loyal animal sidekick in the form of Achilles, his horse, who turns out to be a bit of a one-trick pony (sorry).

Oh, and if you’re wondering which one is the gay character, it’s Hugo, the more rotund of the three stone gargoyles:

We know this because Djali is a male goat in the Disney version, but this isn’t the only difference between the two line-ups, as we’ll see.

Hugo version

http://www.indiana.edu/~liblilly/games/jeuauteurs.html

A windswept Quasimodo, by Bernard Lamotte.

This Quasimodo has been weathered by sarcasm and spite as well as the various branches of the ugly tree, and so decides to stay in the bell tower of his own volition. He’s also stone deaf and chooses to communicate with sign language rather than big musical numbers, although he does speak occasionally. He has a miserable and embittered outlook on the world, but this shifts slightly when he meets a certain someone.

http://www.squidoo.com/hunchback-artEsmeralda, named after her pendant rather than her huge green dinner-plate eyes, is a 16 year-old Egyptian girl.  She believes that her virtue is linked to her pendant, so if she loses either, she will never be able to find her long lost parents. This suggests she is on a quest to find them, but in reality she’s just happy dancing with her goat Djali in front of many an admirer. Not everyone appreciates her charms, however, like a crazy reclusive woman who accuses her of devouring babies, and a man called Frollo.

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/notre-dame-de-paris?before=1351038117In this version, Frollo is an archdeacon instead of a judge, and is so well educated and knowledgeable that some locals suspect him of being a sorceror. He has a useless layabout of a brother named Jehan whom he raised from infancy, giving him money as well as sermons, and he later adds Quasimodo to his family too. He doesn’t believe there is a global gypsy conspiracy afoot, but he does think that Esmeralda was sent by the devil to tempt him away from his virtuous lifestyle.

Esmeralda, on the other hand, could possibly surrender her virtue to Phoebus, the captain of the royal archers. Although aware of the girl’s doe-eyed affection for him, Phoebus tries to extricate himself from the whole affair as much as possible. Instead, he enjoys getting drunk with Frollo’s brother, and it’s implied he tells women he loves them as often as he asks them the time. This is despite the fact he is betrothed to a local noblewoman.

Last but not least, we have the poet and playwright Pierre Gringoire, who was completely shafted in the Disney film. A former student of Frollo’s, he begins as our main character and is unwittingly roped into the world’s creepiest love triangle, but takes a decidedly neutral stance and appears more interested in the goat than anyone else.

In both versions Esmeralda is the link between the characters, but Disney have made her an older and more bootilicious woman rather than a teenager who wears her virginity around her neck. This is possibly to make Frollo’s obsession with her less paedotastic, and Frollo himself is distilled with the negative traits of the other characters so that we have a clear and obvious villain à la The Jungle Book. Despite this darker turn, Hugo’s version hints at a more tragic romantic outcome, as there is little to suggest that any of the lovelorn characters will find happiness with their chosen idol. Quasimodo is also much more embittered in the original, which is surprising considering the way Frollo treats him in comparison to the film version, as we will see.

The Monster and the Man

Disney version

Clearly the face of a man who can be trusted with children.

Frollo first meets Quasimodo while trying to drown him in a well as a baby, mere moments after killing his mother by kicking her down the cathedral steps. For some reason this makes him ideal father material, so the archdeacon of Notre Dame says he must instead adopt the boy as penance for committing murder and attempted infanticide.

Yes, I am talking about the Disney version.

When you’re an up and coming judge, being saddled with a deformed gypsy baby is a bit of an inconvenience, especially if you hate gypsies. But Frollo knuckles down and chooses to express his disdain by giving him a name meaning “half-formed”, confining him to the bell tower for life, and frequently reminding him that anyone else would have drowned him at birth due to his ugliness. Nice.

Well,  at least he has the best house.

Quasimodo therefore grows up to be meek, submissive and fearful of his “master”, but still grateful to him for his kindness, and for taking the time to drop by with some fundamentalist dogma every morning.

And impressionable adults, too.

The judge never threatens him with violence, instead letting the crowd humiliate him with rotten produce when he breaks the rules and sneaks into the Festival of Fools, and then blaming him for everything bad that happens in the world. For example, his letting Esmeralda escape is what ignited the windmill and almost burnt down all of Paris – saying it was Frollo throwing a flaming torch at the roof is just being pedantic.

Likewise, although Quasimodo can hoist Esmeralda and Phoebus around with no problems, he never raises a hand against the judge. Even when he makes another attempt at murdering him and he has no choice but to defend himself, the hunchback simply disarms him, and when Frollo takes a leaf out of Scar’s book and tells him what really happened to his mother while stood precariously on a ledge, the hunchback instead tries to run away and avoid a fight at all costs.

Interestingly, his mother is not quite as sympathetic a figure in the book.

Hugo version

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Sz_k_efbMYs/TsS-Q4AOawI/AAAAAAAAAAQ/vl1uNFnSkMw/s1600/QuasimodoSunday.jpgWhile she is tragically separated from him in the film, in the book Quasimodo’s mother simply gets bored of him and does a swapsie. The hunchback is eventually dumped in the “lost children” section of the chapel at age four. A 19 year-old Frollo then whisks him away, saying he will look after the child like a proper parent and everything. The reason for the more conventional adoption? He reminds him of his own brother, albeit not physically, whom he found abandoned when their parents were killed by the plague.

Since Frollo adopted him out of kindness then, why the cruel name? Well, in actual fact, the child is named Quasimodo mainly because he was found on “Quasimodo Sunday”, also known as the Octave of Easter in the Christian calendar. In addition, Quasimodo takes himself off to the bell tower, as until the age of 15 when he tragically goes deaf, his only joy is ringing the bells, something he and Frollo bonded over. To escape from the taunts of the townspeople he resides here, and it has nothing to do with the archdeacon’s rules.

That’s not to say their relationship is all rainbows and sunshine; Frollo does angrily sign at him from time to time, for example when he joins in the Festival of Fools, and when he is humiliated by the crowd, the archdeacon makes a point of neglecting him, albeit for a different reason. There is however a certain amount of respect that passes between them. For instance, at one point Quasimodo is sincerely sorry for giving him an accidental back-hander when he catches him spying on Esmeralda, and Frollo takes no further action against him. This is in stark contrast to the end of their relationship, as we will see later.

So far it would seem that Hugo’s version is much lighter. Quasimodo is adopted out of genuine compassion, and he and Frollo have a more conventional father-son relationship. There is also a distinct lack of emotional abuse and murder (at least so far), and Frollo even appears to be  a good guy, a tragic survivor who wants to help others. Strangely, this Quasimodo is the bitter and reclusive one, as opposed to the Disney version, who despite being raised out of duty and with no genuine concern or kindness, is gentle and timid and doesn’t want to cause problems for anyone. Disney’s Frollo uses him as a scapegoat for his own guilt and as a free ticket to heaven rather than trying to help anyone other than himself, and it’s the hunchback who is the tragic survivor.

This is partly why Esmeralda rocks his world, as she is the first person to show him kindness without any ulterior motive.

Sanctuary

Disney version

If someone thought you were so ugly you must be wearing a mask, you’d likely be offended. Fortunately, Quasimodo isn’t, as this is how he first meets Esmeralda at the Festival of Fools. However, his subsequent “unmasking” is what makes the crowd turn on him, and only Esmeralda sticks up for him, showing pity on him and cutting him free in direct defiance of Frollo’s orders.

“£5 says I can fit my entire head in your hand.”

Since her name is now mud with the authorities, Esmeralda has to seek sanctuary in the cathedral, where she and Quasimodo sit and compare notes about how much Frollo hates and judges both of them. She shows no fear of the hunchback whatsoever, and likewise, despite being raised on a diet of gypsy hatred, Quasimodo is courteous, polite and shy, and wants to do everything he can to help her escape to thank her for her kindness. This would be a perfectly platonic friendship, if it weren’t for the stone gargoyles who try to cajole Quasimodo into thinking she’s his girlfriend.

Bounce or break, what d’you reckon?

He is almost convinced when she later returns to visit him, even though the whole of Paris is burning in a bid to find her, but finds himself hastily friend-zoned due to Captain Phoebus. His lack of shining armour, knighthood, and misshapen appearance almost make Quasimodo leave her to the authorities, but he redeems himself later by swooping heroically down and rescuing her from a burning stake, in one of the story’s most iconic moments. Likewise, Esmeralda risks her life to save him while battling it out with Frollo on the side of Notre Dame. Too bad she drops him, but this doesn’t seem to bother him afterwards.

Hugo version

In the novel, the pair don’t get off to the best start, mainly because Quasimodo tries to kidnap her and carry her away like a caveman.

http://www.artelista.com/en/great-masters/artwork/1605141163065776-esmeralda-donnant-a-boire-a-quasimodo-sur-la-place-de-greve-illustration-de-notre-dame-de-paris-de-victor-hugo-1802-1885-1879.htmlAfter a bout of dancing in the square after the Festival of Fools, Esmeralda sets off for home down a side street. Quasimodo and a cloaked figure (guess who) try to grab her, but are beaten away by the royal guards. The cloaked figure escapes but Quasimodo is sentenced to the stocks, and the next day is tied up before being brutally whipped and pelted with vegetables for a good hour and a half.

Surprisingly, it’s Esmeralda who steps up to the plate when he begs for water. After she gives him a drink from one of the gourds around her belt, the hunchback sheds a single tear of gratitude, and from then on he makes it his mission to help her, having finally found something that makes him as happy as the bells used to.

Indeed, his heroic cry of “sanctuary” while holding her aloft on the cathedral happens soon after, when she has been accused of murder and witchcraft and he swings down to save her from the gallows. Once she is safely hidden in Notre Dame, he watches over her and brings her food, but keeps out of her sight if he can because she is scared of him. The only exception is when he suggests he try to contact Phoebus for her, after which she becomes excessively grateful and ecstatic. However, when he returns unsuccessful, she then throws a teenage hissy fit and won’t speak to him. This is pretty much the last impression she leaves him with before she escapes.

There is a definite friendship between Esmeralda and Quasimodo in the film, as they are united by Frollo’s ill treatment or persecution, and arguably of a similar age. What’s more, despite such persecution, neither one judges the other. In Hugo’s novel, however, Esmeralda is kind up until the point she realises the hunchback’s affection is more than she can deal with, and her teenage years are more obvious when he fails to do what she wants. She is at best tolerant, and at worst frightened of Quasimodo, who sees her as an object until she blows his mind with real compassion.

The proverbial fly in the ointment is Captain Phoebus, so let’s now see whether this potential romance is going to turn out any better.

“It means God’s gift to women.”

Disney version

Don’t worry, he’s following you because he’s got the horn, not because he’s doing his job.

Both Disney characters have a passion for violence accompanied by a witty remark, so this is a match made in heaven.

Phoebus first ingratiates himself by sneakily stalling some of the other guards when they try to arrest the gypsy, and again by letting her claim sanctuary in the cathedral. This is despite her almost decapitating him during her escape and sending Djali to attack his crotch, so Esmeralda is understandably intrigued. After a brief tussle with candle holders and an exchange of one-liners in Notre Dame, they know it’s meant to be, and this causes a bit of an issue with Phoebus’ chosen career path.

“I know this probably isn’t the time, but how come the wound’s on my chest when I was shot in the back?”

When asked to burn down the miller’s house for harbouring gypsies, and possibly Esmeralda,  Phoebus disobeys Frollo’s orders and is sentenced to death. Fortunately, Esmeralda is a good shot and manages to distract the guards, as well as carry Phoebus back to Notre Dame once he’s been shot with an arrow. When he wakes up, the alcohol starts flowing – mainly over the wound – and the pair share their first kiss as a devastated Quasimodo looks on.

From this point Phoebus is on the side of the gypsies, and risks his life yet again when he goes to warn Esmeralda of an impending attack on her home, the Court of Miracles.

Hugo version

When Esmeralda is captured by Quasimodo, it’s Captain Phoebus who intervenes and rescues her, hoisting her up on to his horse. From that day onward, the young Egyptian is smitten, and even teaches Djali how to spell out his name with blocks.

Unfortunately, Phoebus is in the process of courting his arranged bride, and when the fiancée finds out about the Egyptian girl, she invites her into her house in front of her mother and friends, partly to humiliate her and partly out of curiosity. When Esmeralda leaves soon after, embarrassed, Phoebus follows, and the next thing we hear is that he has hired a room at a local inn for a “rendezvous”, despite making a point of avoiding her during the day.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phoebus.jpg

“I heard popping your cherry could be painful, but this isn’t what I had in mind.”

That night in the room, Esmeralda confesses her love for him, and says that although she would usually remain chaste, she would happily make an exception for him. Because sod your long lost parents when there’s a hot soldier to be had. And anyway, he’s obviously going to marry her afterwards.

Phoebus leads her on regardless, but for some reason appears uncomfortable with the idea of wedlock. Luckily, an irate Frollo intervenes with a stabbing before things can get too awkward, after which Esmeralda faints and for a while believes that Phoebus is dead. The captain is not too bothered about correcting her, as he is too busy sorting out his politically convenient marriage, and when Quasimodo approaches him about the girl, Phoebus drunkenly waves him away and says he wants nothing more to do with her. It’s just as well really, as there was another reason Esmeralda wasn’t marriage material, as we will soon discover.

Hugo’s Esmeralda therefore has a bare-faced teenage obsession with Phoebus, who in turn only sees her as another possible notch on his bedpost before he marries into some money. The Egyptian is completely unaware of this, which makes it all the more tragic in its outcome. Conversely the Disney couple are on an even keel, swapping comebacks and the odd fighting move or two before falling into each other’s arms, and Phoebus’ resolve is also strengthened by this romance. However, Quasimodo is not the only character disappointed at such a union.

Indeed, you may have noticed a rather drastic change in Hugo’s Frollo from compassionate  religious figure to bitter and stab-happy villain. This is due to a growing obsession with Esmeralda, which takes centre stage in the Disney version.

Esmeralda and Frollo

Disney version

“Sorry, I’m not into guys in uniform.”

Frollo actively hates gypsies, people who disobey his orders, and people who send the guards careering into his booth while he’s sitting in it. Esmeralda is guilty on all three counts, but this doesn’t stop him from creepily smelling her hair and telling her he is a patient man, and that he will catch her one day or another, whether she claims sanctuary or not.

“If I had access to porn this might have been avoided.”

“Patient” may have been a bit of an exaggeration, because after a demonic singalong with his fireplace, and after hearing the gyspy has escaped the cathedral, Frollo takes the executive decision to burn down half of Paris to find her. As you may have guessed, this is not just revenge for being upstaged in public; Frollo is tormented by lust, and either wants Esmeralda for himself, or for her to be burned as a witch.

When he finally gets his virtuous hands on her, she is tied up and ready to be burnt alive for the crime of witchcraft. However, apparently witchcraft is acceptable provided you are happy to bone the judge who is accusing you of it, so Frollo offers her the choice of him or a fiery death. Rather than saying yes, kicking him in the nuts and then making her escape, Esmeralda spits in his face and watches in horror as the pyre is lit. When someone chooses a horrible death instead of your company, it puts paid to any idea of romance, so from this point onward, Frollo is happy for her to be brutally murdered.

Hugo version

http://www.squidoo.com/hunchback-artEsmeralda’s kindness towards Quasimodo isn’t what makes Frollo sit up and take notice in this version – it’s her very existence. It seems he has already been gawping at her from afar, and occasionally watches her dance in the square while muttering about witchcraft. On hearing about her planned meeting with Phoebus, he has the audacity to approach the archer about this and even offers him money so he can come and watch. Just to double check it’s really her, of course, and that she is really a virgin. Phoebus is cool with this, because it’s money after all, but makes sure the priest is locked in a cupboard and out of the way before he gets his freak on with the girl.

Before any hanky-panky can take place, Frollo frees himself and then frames Esmeralda for Phoebus’ murder. Although no one notices Phoebus didn’t actually die from his stab wounds, Esmeralda she is arrested and put on trial anyway. The overwhelming evidence against her comes in the form of Djali’s testimony, that is, the goat spells out the victim’s name in blocks. Esmeralda is then taken to the torture chamber and given a go on this jolly contraption, known as a brodequin:

http://lescouloirsdutempschampenois.wifeo.com/images/2/202/202_1.jpg

After screaming her confession to the murder and witchcraft, they then throw her in the dungeon, telling her she will spend the night there in pitch darkness, but if it’s any consolation, she should still be able to dance. In theory. At least until tomorrow, when she’ll be hanged in the square.

Frollo is kind enough to pay her a visit soon after, only to tell her she has ruined his life by bringing his virtuousness into question, and that he is glad she is going to die. However, he changes his tune ever so slightly later on, after she has escaped the gallows and found sanctuary in Notre Dame.

He and Gringoire come to “rescue” her, but while Gringoire absconds with the goat (don’t ask), Frollo makes Esmeralda the same offer the Disney version made, only this time, she will either hang or be his lover. The girl once again turns him down, so he gets the crazy reclusive woman to restrain her while he fetches the palace guards to execute her.

So let’s recap: a 35 year-old archdeacon becomes obsessed with a naive 16 year-old girl, and not only frames her for the murder of the man she loves but orchestrates her torture, gloats over her execution, and then rewards her with the prize of rape or hanging. All this, despite her not doing anything to arouse his anger. The Disney version, at least, gives Frollo a more obvious reason to get angry with the gypsy – she has defied him in public, he hates gypsies anyway, and he doesn’t like the loss of control, lust or otherwise.  However, Disney make Frollo’s reaction much more extreme, in that he starts locking up peasants and burning down houses to get what he wants, culminating in an attempt at mass murder in the middle of the square. Esmeralda would also suffer a far more painful death at his hands.

Frollo manages to capture Esmeralda and her gypsy brethren in the first place  because he finds their aforementioned hideout, which holds more than a few surprises for both sets of characters.

The Court of Miracles

Disney version

Finding the Court of Miracles, and presumably crushing all the gypsies therein, is why the judge initially hired Phoebus. The captain clearly notices Frollo’s tin foil hat but goes along with the plan anyway, at least until he starts chucking fire about in his quest to capture Esmeralda.

Thanks to his friendship with the gypsy girl, Quasimodo has a way of finding it, and just in time too, because Frollo is apparently planning an attack at dawn. He and Phoebus manage to crack the code, despite being distracted by their cock contest, and head down into the catacombs to find Esmeralda and the others to warn them.

“Don’t worry kids, I won’t leave anything out of the story. Even the bit where I try to murder your heroes in cold blood. Hey, why are you crying?”

Said gypsies are not quite as welcoming as expected. After ambushing the two heroes, their leader, Clopin (who incidentally is our storyteller), has them bound and gagged and sentences them to hang for being Frollo’s spies. Luckily his own hand puppets distract him long enough for Esmeralda to dash on to the scene and order a halt to the execution, after which Phoebus is extremely forgiving and warns them of Frollo’s attack. Too late, however, as the judge has followed them right there and captures everyone, hinting that they will all be burnt alive in the city square the next day. All except for Quasimodo, who will be chained up in Notre Dame so he keeps out of trouble.

Hugo version

The Court of Miracles is also the home of the gypsies in the original, but it’s in plain sight and is simply a no-go area of the city (think The Shades in Discworld, except with less hilarity). Clopin is the king, but he does share some power with the “Duke of Egypt and Bohemia”, and the “Emperor of Galilee”, and has an equal penchant for hanging innocent people.

This time the victim is Pierre Gringoire, our shafted playwright. After the Festival of Fools and Esmeralda’s dancing steal the thunder from his stage play, he takes off in a huff into the streets of Paris, where he both tries and fails to rescue Esmeralda from Quasimodo. Not long after, he is captured by some of the gypsies and brought on trial in the Court. If he can successfully pick the pocket of a dummy, without making it move or falling and breaking his neck from a great height, they will spare him and allow him to become a thief like them.

Unsurprisingly, he fails, and is sentenced to hang. Fortunately, Clopin suddenly remembers that he can offer the prisoner’s hand in marriage, and if anyone accepts, he will be granted a stay of execution. Esmeralda appears and says that she will marry him, and so she and Gringoire are made husband and wife for a minimum of four years. His attempts to consummate the marriage fail, as the girl sort of blinks at him and explains she only did it to save him, after which Gringoire contents himself with cuddling Djali, and is equally nonplussed when Frollo later cross-examines him about the entire ordeal. As we saw earlier, Esmeralda is also strangely silent on this topic when enthralled in the embrace of Phoebus.

The members of the Court of Miracles are rather brutal in both stories, but again the Disney version has more rhyme and reason – they are trying to protect themselves from being discovered, as they know Frollo will kill them all if they are ever found. Hugo’s gypsies are just an unpleasant bunch trying to recruit new members or kill trespassers, so Esmeralda’s kindness is even more highlighted. In both versions she comes to the rescue of the heroes, but also ends up in need of rescue herself. Guess which version turns out for the better.

War on Notre Dame

Disney version

When all seems lost for both the gypsies and Esmeralda, Quasimodo manages to break free of his chains in the bell tower and swings down to rescue her. Outraged, Frollo orders his guards to break into the cathedral, so the hunchback responds by throwing debris and even pouring lead over the side, regardless of the hundreds of innocent people who are congregating in the square below.

Pictured: Reasonable force.

The crowd then rushes the guards, but Frollo manages to squeeze in through the battered main door. After shoving the archdeacon down the stairs, he rushes up to find Quasimodo weeping over Esmeralda, who apparently died from smoke inhalation. He takes this chance for a stabbing, which the hunchback easily deflects, and makes the astute observation that Frollo may just be the most wicked person he has ever met.

Esmeralda suddenly comes to, so Quasimodo whisks her away on to the side of the cathedral as the judge pursues them with a sword. The stone gargoyles do sod all to help, so the judge very nearly sends Quasimodo plunging to his death and tries to behead Esmeralda. Fortunately, poetic justice in the form of a completely unrelated stone gargoyle means Frollo is the one who plummets into the fiery pit. In the meantime, Phoebus has fought free and arrives just in time to catch Quasimodo as he loses his grip.

“They see me as A man, as well as THE man. Bonus!”

Reunited and victorious, Esmeralda, Phoebus and Quasimodo emerge from Notre Dame into the square where it’s suddenly daytime, and it seems the crowd was thoughtful enough to wait up all night for them. Then the world’s weirdest looking child goes up and starts touching Quasimodo’s face. Rather than back handing her and giving her an odd look, Quasimodo hugs her and the crowd finally accepts him as a human being. They hoist him on their shoulders and carry him away into the square, while Esmeralda, Phoebus and Djali (who suddenly appears out of nowhere) stand beaming on the steps of the cathedral.

By this point you are probably thinking that the Hugo version can’t be all that much worse, and that the Disney film is the one with the darker and more depressing elements (the torturing of a young girl notwithstanding).  Well, the main difference here is that Hugo decided to cash in all his chips at the end.

Hugo version

http://www.niceartgallery.com/Louis-Boulanger/Sachette,-Esmeralda-and-Claude-Frollo,-1831.html

Sachette, Esmeralda and Claude Frollo, by Louis Boulanger

In their plan to rescue Esmeralda from the cathedral and get her to safety, Gringoire and Frollo decide to distract the royal guards by sending the gyspies at them. They therefore tell Clopin and the others that there is a plan afoot to kidnap Esmeralda from inside Notre Dame  and hang her.

No one bothered to tell Quasimodo this plan, nor would he have been able to hear an explanation, so when the gyspy army turns up at the cathedral, he mistakenly thinks they are the ones who have come to kill Esmeralda. He ends up throwing beams, bricks, and pouring lead down on to them, and also murdering Frollo’s rabble-rousing brother  by throwing him off the side of Notre Dame. A round of applause for the hunchback, everyone.

It’s at this point that Gringoire and Frollo get into the cathedral and take Esmeralda and Djali away with them. Quasimodo doesn’t realise she has gone until it’s too late and Frollo has already left her in the care of the crazy recluse.

We then discover that the crazy recluse is Esmeralda’s real mother, and that Esmeralda and Quasimodo were swapped in infancy by the gypsies (hence her belief that Esmeralda and “her kind” eat babies). Reunited mother and daughter cry with joy, and the mother pulls her into her cell to hide her before the guards arrive. This all goes to plan, until Phoebus happens to ride by on his horse, and Esmeralda emits a fan-girl squeal and shouts out to get his attention. He doesn’t hear her, but the recently departed guards do. The mother is then killed in a desperate and screaming tussle to protect her daughter, but the gypsy girl is carried away  to be hanged nonetheless. No one comes to her aid, although there are a couple of pitying murmurs from some of the guards.

Unfortunately, unlike in the film, things don’t improve by the light of day.

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5054/5507507950_25580d6a1a_b.jpgThe next morning, Quasimodo finds Frollo standing on the roof of Notre Dame watching something. Following his gaze, he sees Esmeralda getting executed in the square. When she finally stops twitching at the end of the noose, Frollo laughs, and so the hunchback gives him a shove and sends him plummeting to his own death.

It’s not all bad news though. Gringoire has managed to escape with his beloved Djali, and realises he’s got a knack for writing tragedies. He therefore decides to spread misery and sorrow to all of his audiences for the rest of his days.

Djali, on the other hand, is believed to have been the devil acting through Frollo and Quasimodo. Consequently, the priest is not buried on hallowed ground or given a proper funeral.

Quasimodo disappears, thereby also implicating himself, only for a strange and malformed skeleton to be found years later in the crypt. Its arms are wrapped around the skeleton of a young girl with a broken neck, and when disturbed, its bones turn to dust.

As for Phoebus, the book assures us he had the worst fate of all. He got married.

Hey, at least the goat survived.

In fact, it’s probably worth noting that Djali has the most sense of any of the characters, completely avoiding the battle on the cathedral and the attempt at mass execution in both versions. Although it’s mainly Frollo’s obsession that starts the showdown at Notre Dame, in the original novel the others reach their peak as well – Quasimodo kills his adoptive brother and father to protect or avenge Esmeralda, and Esmeralda’s obsession makes her break cover, sacrificing herself, her mother and her lifelong dream of meeting her family just because Phoebus happened to be passing by. Conversely, it’s at this stage of the film that Frollo’s madness unites everyone – the crowd rushes the cathedral to protect the gypsies, and Quasimodo finally stands up to his master to protect his friend. This results in him winning the hearts and minds of the peasants and gaining acceptance.

Conclusion

As well as pressing the “nuke character” button, Hugo’s story shows us the dangers of obsession, authority figures, and teaching animals cute tricks. Frollo, who was hitherto a compassionate father figure and respectable religious authority, becomes a violent and manipulative cad. Esmeralda’s obsession nearly makes her betray her own principles, and ends up costing her her life because all that matters to her is winning Phoebus’ affection and attention. Phoebus himself starts out as a heroic protector, but is then revealed to be selfish and hedonistic. Quasimodo is the only one whose personality improves due to his infatuation, but when it results in him starving to death while wrapped around a dead body, it’s not exactly a positive change.

Conversely, the Disney version is about prejudice, the dangers of religious dogma, and that even if things don’t always work out in the romance department, you can always rely on your friends. All three main male characters are driven to take a stand because of their feelings for Esmeralda, but it’s only the ones who truly love her who survive and become a force for good. It’s therefore also a story about the power of love and friendship, and how it can transcend appearances and misconceptions.

In comparison to the original, Disney have thrown rainbows and sunshine at the ending before burying it in the catacombs. The people who are unfairly treated are redeemed, and the crowd sees the error of its ways and fights to protect them. The characters in the book have no such luck, their discrimination only increasing, and their love or obsessions driving them to disaster and changing them into different people. However, Disney more than make up for such sugar-coating by taking a much heavier hand to some of the elements in the book, emphasising the persecution and hatred felt by some of the characters.

As a closing observation,  both goats get away suspiciously scot free. And are conveniently absent when things like torture or witch burning are going on. There is therefore only one real conclusion to this entry, and it is as follows:

http://www.iamthedivablog.com/2008/04/that-really-gets-my-goat.html

They’ll eat everything. INCLUDING YOUR SOUL.

Sources

1)  The Hunchback of Notre Dame, 1996. Film. Directed by Gary Trousdale and Kirk Wise, U.S.A. Walt Disney Pictures.

2) Hugo, Victor. Notre-Dame de Paris. Hachette, Paris, 1990. ISBN: 978-201-014-551-3

3) http://www.victorhugo.gg/victor-hugo/  [online]

4) http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/274974/Victor-Hugo/3352/Success-1830-51 [online]

5) Real Life Quasimodo uncovered in Tate archives, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/artsandentertainmentbooksreview/7945634/Real-life-Quasimodo-uncovered-in-Tate-archives.html

Posted in Disney vs. Original | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Top 5 Disney Scores

I don’t know much about music, but I know what I like, and there are several Disney scores that have stuck in my mind long after the film has finished. Unfortunately, these pieces usually get shafted in favour of the catchy songs, but I would advise you to check out the following. I’m cheating slightly as there were too many for the “official” list, but with this in mind are there any that you would have included?

Honourable Mentions

Beauty and the Beast

Composer: Alan Menken

Have I heard of his stuff? I imagine yes: The Little Mermaid, Pocahontas and Aladdin sit happily on his C.V.

Comments: I’ll probably get lambasted for not putting this one on the list, at which point I kindly refer you to the first word of the post title. When the sombre strings of the film title suddenly give way to that delicate piano, you know you’re in for something special, so it’s no surprise that this score won a Golden Globe back in the day.

Stand out track: West Wing, where Belle goes poking about in the Beast’s quarters and is later pursued by a pack of wolves.

Can I buy it? Yup. Both the original and Special Edition versions are also on iTunes, for all you crazy kids.

The Rescuers Down Under

Composer: Bruce Broughton

Have I heard of his stuff? If you’re an 80s kid, probably, such as Harry and the Hendersons and Baby’s Day Out, and he’s also created music for some of the Florida and Paris Disney rides.

Comments: This film seems to fly under the radar, but the score is quite exhilarating (apt for riding on the back of a massive eagle). Also, it has some native percussion bits going on here and there, so if you like the Lion King, you might like this too.

Stand out track: Cody’s Flight, where Cody frees the eagle Marahute from a trap before flying with her over the Australian outback.

Can I buy it? Yup.  Again, it’s also on iTunes for the princely sum of £9.99. Fun fact: a couple of years after the film came out, before the internet existed (let that sink in a moment), a C.D. copy of this soundtrack would have cost you £200.  I like to think I had expensive tastes rather than awkward.

#5

Brother Bear

Composer: Mark Mancina

Have I heard of his stuff? Speed, Twister, and Tarzan were some of his tinkerings, and he also helped out with the production of the Lion King stage score.

Comments: This is another score that tries to incorporate some native instruments or music; the stand out track is sung in the Inuit language Inuktitut (by the Bulgarian Women’s Choir for some reason). The orchestral pieces are more conventional, but there is enough twinkling percussion and soft voices to give it an air of mystery too.

Stand out track: Transformation, when Kenai is transformed into a bear by a spirit. It sounds a bit like a (far less annoying) group of ewoks singing on a starry night.

Can I buy it? Yup. Again it can also be found languishing on iTunes.

#4

The Little Mermaid

Composer: Alan Menken (again)

Have I heard of his stuff? Yep, see Beauty and the Beast; he has many a Disney score under his belt.

Comments: I remember being blown away by this score at the cinema (then again I was about 7), as it immediately took you to this amazing undersea fantasy world where mermaids still had an aura of mystery. You also got a sense of the manly sailors and the twee royal subjects milling about in the nearby villages in other parts of the score.

Stand out track: the Main Titles, where a surviving fish leads us down into the mer kingdom. Also, have a chuckle at some of the O.T.T. YouTube comments further along; it’s a nice piece of music guys, but really?

Can I buy it? Yup. Also on iTunes, but ixnay on stealing the title track, it’s all or nothing here people!

#3

Mulan

Composer: The late, great Jerry Goldsmith

Have I heard of his stuff? Most definitely. Secret of Nimh, The Omen, L.A. Confidential, Star Trek the Motion Picture, Alien, First Knight, Gremlins, I could go on all day. His best and most underrated work is said to be the music for Ridley Scott’s director’s cut of Legend.

Comments: There’s something about the brass instruments in this score that show how much Mulan is on a mission of defiance as well as survival, and how desperate her situation is, while still remembering it’s supposed to be a score for a children’s film. Also,  we’re simply aware that this story takes place in China, so the music isn’t going “look look Mulan is Chinese!!” every five minutes.

Stand out track: Suite from Mulan, as this weaves all the main musical themes together and gives a good idea of what you can expect from the rest of the soundtrack.

Can I buy it? Yup. Also on iTunes.

#2

Dinosaur

Composer: James Newton Howard

Have I heard of his stuff? Probably – if you’ve watched the three decent M. Night Shyamalan films you would have heard some of his music, and he also co-write The Dark Knight as well as King Kong and others.

Comments: I know this isn’t a traditional Disney film, but the music is so fantastic I couldn’t leave this out. It’s as if the scores from Jurassic Park and The Lion King had a baby, which wasn’t quite as legendary by comparison but still awesome. A few Brits reading this may also recognise elements of the Walking With Dinosaurs series that was on BBC back in the late 90s.

Stand out track: The Egg Travels, where Aladar’s egg is deposed from his mother’s nest and manhandled by various creatures before being dropped on an island (good thing it has air bags then).

Can I buy it? Yup. You’d obviously go for the used version though! Unfortunately, it’s “dinosaur” by name as well as by nature – it’s not on iTunes anywhere.

#1

The Lion King

Composer: Hans Zimmer

Have I heard of his stuff? Tsk, you had to ask? How about Gladiator, The Dark Knight, Inception, The Game of Thrones (season 2), and so on unto infinity.

Comments: Well, I’ve mentioned this one so many times that you probably guessed it already. Much like The Little Mermaid, the music for The Lion King transports you straight to an expansive and magical Africa, and even the incidental parts of the score are strong enough to work as extra songs in the stage version (see Shadowlands and Endless Night).

Stand out track: [Puts on hipster glasses] Frustratingly, the official soundtrack only has a smidgen of the original score included; there is a bootleg copy doing the rounds on the internet, and a campaign to get Disney to release it officially (no cigar as yet, but plenty of reissued remixes that no one wants!). My favourite track is from the bootleg version and is called The Once and Future King. It takes place when Rafiki is painting young Simba’s picture on the wall and continues until Mufasa is leading his son on a tour of the kingdom. The track This Land on the official score has the first part of this, and is slightly faster.

Can I buy it? The official score? Yup. Also on iTunes. No sign of the full score yet though (sniff).

Thanks again for indulging me with another post not entirely related to the blog.

Which Disney scores struck a chord with you, and why?

Posted in Top 5s | 3 Comments

Tarzan vs. Tarzan of the Apes

Set in the early 20th Century, Disney’s Tarzan is the story of a man who is raised by apes in the wilds of Africa and  discovered by his own kind years later. Cue the “nature versus nurture” argument, identity crises on both sides, and lots of partial nudity.

One of the most popular and famous literary characters of all time was created out of sheer boredom, and possibly even for satirical purposes. Stuck in a thrilling job advertising pencil sharpeners in trashy magazines, the then unknown American author, Edgar Rice Burroughs, decided he could do a better job of writing than they did. And so Tarzan  was born, and subsequently pimped out to as many types of media as possible – with Burroughs’ blessing. This was considered a terrible move at the time, as it was feared the different types of media would be competing with one another, but the explosion of Tarzan comics, books, films and television series proved otherwise.

The Disney version appears to be based on the very first story of Tarzan of the Apes, which was written in 1912. At least, this is what I can gather from the altogether unhelpful “From Burroughs to Disney” documentary on the Special Edition DVD. Aside from Burroughs’ grandson saying his grandfather wrote the book and isn’t that great, the rest is just self-congratulatory clips of the production team talking about how awesome the film is. To be fair, if they took the time to list all of the cringe-inducingly offensive and hilariously outdated references to blacks, native Africans and women they had to take out, it would be longer than the entire Tarzan back catalogue.

So aside from the necessary cultural updates then, is the Disney version true to the original, or does it leave it swinging in the wind?

Main Characters

Disney version

Little known fact: Tarzan was a pioneer of invisible skateboarding.
Tubular!

Our remarkably clean-shaven protagonist is fearless, curious, and good at mimicking sounds, albeit human speech, animal noises or gun shots. Tarzan spends most of his life trying to win the approval of his chief, Kerchak, and is acutely aware that he is different to the other gorillas in the troop. Despite this, he seems very at home in the jungle and initially doesn’t explore the reasons why he may be different.

English rose Jane Porter is a brave but mildly eccentric explorer and animal lover. Her interest in gorillas brings her to Tarzan’s neck of the woods, and she is relatively open-minded when it comes to the ape language and being slung unceremoniously through the trees, whichever is necessary. She is accompanied by her father, the doddery Professor Porter.

Kala is Tarzan’s adoptive mother, and you’ll spot her because she’s the least gormless-looking gorilla in the troop. She gives Tarzan as much love and attention as she would the real baby that she lost, and embodies the film’s moral message – deep down everyone is the same and should be treated as such. She therefore fights her son’s corner when needed, even defying the leader of the troop, but is mildly afraid of his choice of date.

Kerchak is the short-tempered but wise leader of the gorillas. Despite flying into a chest-beating rage at the drop of a hat, he recovers himself quickly and does have good intentions at heart. However, he remains distinctly unimpressed by Tarzan and his actions, judging him an outsider and a threat to the family on more than one occasion.

With the posh British accent and leech-like moustache, Clayton (voiced by Brian Blessed) has “obvious villain” written all over him. He is assigned as an escort to Jane and her father, but shockingly has an ulterior motive, possibly related to the propensity to fire his gun at every  given opportunity.

Any action scenes/deaths not instigated by the trigger-happy Clayton are caused by this friendly-looking leopard. Known as Sabor, his internal monologue mostly consists of “RARR RARR I AM HUNGRY RARR RARR FOOD RARR RARR WHY ARE YOU GETTING IN THE WAY OF MY HUNGRY RARR RARR I DON’T CARE IF YOU HAVE A SPEAR I HAVE A HUNGRY RARR RARR”. Tarzan isn’t the only one with an identity crisis either, as Sabor’s markings are suspiciously close to a jaguar’s.

Finally, we have Tarzan’s (mostly pointless) animal sidekicks, Tantor the elephant, and Tarzan’s “cousin” Terk, the unexpectedly female gorilla, who on a good day sounds like a parrot being murdered. They fill the parts of neurotic scaredy-cat and annoying smart aleck respectively.

Burroughs Version

Instead of mimicking noises, this Tarzan likes brawling with the local predators and hanging people from branches before taking a break to read Baby’s First Alphabet. Hardly the behaviour befitting the son of Lord Greystoke, otherwise known as John Clayton, but as he begins to learn of his human heritage, the young aristocrat changes his behaviour, deciding to wear a loin cloth rather than swinging through the trees “tackle out”, and shaving off his facial hair. He prefers one-up-man-ship over the apes rather than their approval, and once Jane Porter arrives on the scene, he does his utmost to become a real gentleman.

A rare image of Jane wearing more than Tarzan.

Jane is the beautiful and quietly brave daughter of a professor from Baltimore. She and her black servant, Esmeralda, share a passion for fainting whenever danger rears its ugly head, although she does manage to mitigate this after meeting Tarzan. Despite having feelings for another man in her entourage, Jane is enthralled by the ape man, and so her head and her heart are constantly waging war.

Jane’s other admirer is the current Lord Greystoke, and Tarzan’s cousin, William Cecil Clayton. He has followed Jane on her journey like a faithful hound and is the epitome of the 19th Century gentleman, but becomes a green-eyed monster when faced with a muscular stallion of ape man.

Professor Q. Porter, Jane’s doo-lally father, is quite possibly the most irritating character ever committed to text, prefacing every sentence with “Tut tut, [insert name here], tut tut.” He has a habit of wandering off and falling for money scams, with only his long-suffering companion, Mr. Philander, available to tug on the reins occasionally.

Lieutenant D’Arnot is a French officer who is investigating the shipwreck and mutiny of Jane’s ship. He and Tarzan become “bros” as they embark on a jungle road trip together, and he demonstrates admirable bravery and patience, keeping his trousers dry despite being captured and tortured by cannibals, and teaching Tarzan the language of men in perhaps the most complicated way possible.

Said cannibals constitute the main antagonists of the story. A tribe of native blacks driven from the Congo by cruel white taskmasters, they have an impressive collection of cooking pots and war paint, and maintain impeccable political incorrectness throughout the tale.

Finally, we have the animals.

Surprisingly, the apes in the original are not gorillas – it is implied they are somewhere between gorillas and chimpanzees, and more intelligent. Kerchak is the head of the troop, but his tantrums are murderous rather than merely chest-beating, and Kala is part of his group but not his mate. She is just as caring toward Tarzan as she is in the Disney version, and she needs to be, because all of the other apes, without exception, want Tarzan beaten up or killed. Terkoz, Tarzan’s step brother, is one of them, and at one point tries to carry Jane off for a bit of inter-species bonding. So he and Terk share half a name as well as the disdain of people everywhere.

Sabor is a lioness rather than a leopard, and Tantor the elephant is never seen, only inferred – he is said to be the one thing that Kerchak fears, so a far cry from the quivering coward in the Disney version.

Aside from making Tarzan of aristocratic lineage, Burroughs’ version is more heavily focused on the human characters, and except for Kala, all of the animals are depicted as savage beasts. There is also a competition for the hand of the fair Jane. By contrast, Disney focuses more on the animals and makes them more sympathetic, with the exception of Sabor. The human cast, hailing from England instead, is drastically cut down, and for some reason the name Clayton is used for the antagonist. As with The Jungle Book, Disney have (unsurprisingly) thrown out any references to colonialism and slavery.

So, how did Tarzan come to sit on the fence between humans and animals?

The Set Up

Disney version 

“My moustache says we should go that way.”

As Phil Collins sings a brave and jolly tune, we are introduced to Tarzan’s parents, who are leaping to safety from an exploding ship with their baby in their arms. They end up marooned on the shores of a then undiscovered part of Africa, and make the best of a bad situation by building a cliff top tree house that would make most ten year-olds foam at the mouth, and playing with their baby son as they gather food and provisions.

Meanwhile, in the depths of the jungle, Kala and Kerchak are basking in the glow of their new baby, and both parents seem to be settling into their new situation. However, Sabor soon puts paid to any idea of familial bliss, snatching the young gorilla away one moment, and then popping in to Tarzan’s shack for a quick massacre later. Fortunately, Tarzan has somehow been overlooked, and his cries are heard by the passing gorilla troop. The grieving Kala reacts immediately and goes to the source, avoiding the discarded parents and finding the infant bawling under a blanket, so already Tarzan has survived a leopard attack, suffocation, and demonstrated incredible voice amplification.

Gorilla and baby form a close bond moments before Sabor launches another attack. Thanks to safety netting and an extremely durable nappy, Tarzan doesn’t plunge to his death, and Kala whisks him away, leaving the predator tangled in the tree.

“You’ve got to let her keep him, Kerchak. I mean I’m twice as annoying and you haven’t fed me to a leopard…yet.”

On returning to the troop, Kala is greeted with tolerant interest from the other gorilla mothers, and a roar in the face from Kerchak, who although relieved at her safe return, will not allow her to keep her prize as it is clearly dangerous and an outsider. When Kala points out that she practically wrestled a leopard to save him and that there are no others, Kerchak relents, but stresses that this does not make the boy his son and cannot replace the one they lost. Kala names her new child “Tarzan”, and by all accounts the other gorillas treat him as they would any other baby.

Burroughs version

John Clayton, a.k.a. Lord Greystoke, has dragged his pregnant wife Alice to the Congo to investigate the illegal recruitment of natives, only for their ship’s crew to mutiny and leave them marooned on the terrifying shores of darkest Africa. Left with only a revolver, some books and basic supplies, Greystoke protects his wife and budding family by aiming pot shots into the jungle and building them a raised cabin on the beach. Unfortunately, this is not enough to protect them from the hulking huge ape that soon comes a-knocking; Alice is able to kill it with the revolver, but due to her feeble woman’s brain she then faints and goes mad at the horror of it all. She remains a few sandwiches short of a picnic thereafter, but manages to give birth to their son a few months later.

Meanwhile, in the jungle, Kerchak is having one of his homicidal strops,  and unfortunately Kala and her new baby are in his firing line. As she leaps to escape his fangs, she loses her grip on the child and it plummets to its death.

In the interim, Alice has inconveniently died, leaving Greystoke alone to care for his baby son. Just as he is wondering what to do about his lack of breasts, his door is kicked in by Kerchak, who thunders in and kills him. As he goes for the baby boy, Kala deftly swaps him for her own infant. Despite the protests of everyone – Kala’s grumpy mate Tublat in particular – Kerchak allows her to keep her new son because otherwise she will leave the troop, and being a strong young female of breeding age she is handy to have around.

Kala names her new son “Tarzan”, meaning “pale skin”, and has just as much of a job protecting him from her spiteful cohorts as Greystoke did.

Burroughs’ version explains more about Tarzan’s parents and how they came to be in this situation. The shores of Africa are a terrifying and dangerous place for them, and the fact that Tarzan survives his parents’ deaths is no guarantee he will live any longer, even under the protection of Kala. Kerchak is also indirectly responsible for the death of Kala’s baby, and utterly responsible for the death of Tarzan’s father. By contrast, Disney’s version sees the shores of Africa as a dangerous but beautiful place that can be lived with, and the parents and baby gorilla are killed by the excessively savage Sabor rather than the gentle apes, giving both sides a common link. This also reiterates the message of the opening song, “two worlds, one family”.

Tarzan is therefore destined to grow up among the denizens of the jungle, so how does he get on in his new surroundings?

Animal Antics

Disney version

Scaring his mother with elephant impressions (not that kind) can only entertain the young Tarzan for so long. However, the other gorilla children aren’t as eager to play with him, and Terk tries to dissuade him by saying he can only tag along if he can get an elephant’s hair. This results in Tarzan diving into a lagoon and yanking a hair from an elephant’s tail, causing a stampede that almost crushes one of the new babies in his troop. Although he inevitably suffers Kerchak’s anger, Tarzan impresses Terk and baby elephant Tantor enough for them to tolerate his presence, and they become firm friends, growing up together.

A young Disney protagonist, creeping up behind a chameleon. Nothing bad ever happens after that.

Unfortunately, Kerchak was the one that Tarzan really wanted to impress, so he takes it upon himself to become “the best ape ever” and win his approval. He does this by acting like every other animal except an ape, of course. By watching a rhino sharpen its horn, monkeys jumping across vines and a hippo swimming, he learns to use a spear, swing through the trees and swim underwater in another trademark Disney montage.

It’s not all fun and games, however, because yet again Sabor has arrived to spoil the party. Now a fully grown adult, Tarzan is able to intervene when the leopard attacks his family, even coming to the rescue of the mighty Kerchak. With the help of the aforementioned spear, he kills the leopard and then holds him aloft before letting loose his trademark bellow. Even Kerchak looks impressed as the human lays his prey at his feet, but any recognition has to wait for later – a gunshot suddenly shatters the air, and the troop must head deep into the jungle to safety.

Tarzan Kill Count: 1 Leopard

Burroughs version

Burroughs’ Tarzan spends more time surviving than enjoying his encounters with the friendly neighbourhood animals. Fortunately, they are sometimes kind enough to impart lessons while handing him back his arse.

The first lesson is learnt when ten year-old Tarzan is at the local watering hole one day, and Sabor ambushes him and his “cousin”. Rather than wetting his pants on the spot like his companion, Tarzan not only manages to escape by diving into the water, but inadvertently learns how to swim as well. His “cousin” isn’t so lucky, which means that Terk gets eaten in the original too. Bonus!

http://zburian.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/tarzan-of-apes-chapter-viii.html

Image by Zdenek Burian

Not every encounter goes as swimmingly (sorry); some time later, after Tarzan has recovered a knife from his father’s cabin, he finds himself in the shadow of a huge gorilla. Known as  Bolgani, this designer-label-sound-a-like is a hated enemy of Tarzan’s tribe and proceeds to beat him to a pulp. By an enormous fluke, Tarzan points the knife blade-first as he charges. His enemy dead, Tarzan collapses in a heap to be found later by Kala, who nurses him back to health over several laborious months.

Being close to death seems to invigorate Tarzan, especially now he has a new weapon to play with, and once he has fully recovered, he seeks out new ways to annoy the local predators as well as members of his tribe he doesn’t gel with. Kerchak is slightly out of his league at this point, so he turns his attention to his step father, Tublat, lassooing him and suspending him from the odd branch when the mood takes him, before finally killing him with the knife during an attack on his mother. Surprisingly, Kerchak doesn’t bat an eyelid, at least not until Tarzan challenges him to a cock contest a few years later.

http://blogs.evtrib.com/nerdvana/books/tarzan-of-the-apes-simian-man-saga-celebrates-a-century/78674/

Image by Frank Frazetta

This happens when Tarzan is 18, and he goes to hunt Sabor for a final time. A previous attempt using the noose and knife blade ended in failure, so to make sure it’s an even playing field, Tarzan has procured some poisonous arrows from a nearby village. I’ll leave you to guess how quickly this fight came to an end; afterwards Tarzan eats most of the lioness before taking her hide back the troop to lord it over Kerchak. At this direct challenge, the ape leader rushes him, but with the aid of his knife and a strong head lock, Tarzan finally defeats his foe and assumes the role of head of the tribe. This was more for his ego than anything else; once he is in charge, he gets bored and decides to check out the humans.

Tarzan Kill Count: 1 Gorilla, 2 Apes, 1 Lioness

http://comicartcommunity.com/gallery/details.php?image_id=1028&sessionid=df99f9ed10bcd46ad5a55c148a7b3392

Image by Joe Jusko

As you can see, Disney’s Tarzan interacts with and learns from the animals by playing with or copying them, whereas Burroughs’ Tarzan does this by escaping, teasing or killing them, even members of his own tribe, and is a bit of a shit-stirrer all round. In all fairness, the latter has his life on the line whenever he deals with anything other than his mother, whereas the Disney Tarzan is living a fairly harmonious life with the other jungle creatures. However, both Tarzans use their human ingenuity and tools to improve their lives or get the better of their enemies, so regardless of their wild upbringing they are still influenced by their own kind. How will they react when faced with the real thing?

Strangers Like Me

Disney version

Tarzan goes to investigate the gun shot that stole his thunder, and finds Clayton and the Porters battling their way through the undergrowth on their gorilla expedition. At the same time, Terk, Tantor and other gorilla chums are battling their way through the empty human camp with a pointless musical number, so human and animal relations don’t get off to the best start when the two groups come face to face. Kerchak sternly warns his people to stay away from the newcomers, but Tarzan is understandably intrigued, especially by Jane, and seeks them out to know more.

Rather than scare the gorillas away with Clayton’s gun, Jane suggests they try to teach Tarzan their language and get him to take them to their nest. Over several days, the ape man has his mind blown by images of towns, cities, clothing, and by looking through telescopes. A blown mind apparently accelerates the learning process, because by the end of the week, Tarzan can read and understand most sentences in English as well as form some of his own. This is perhaps the one occasion where Disney can get away with their English characters saying “by jove” and “hullaballoo”, but Tarzan is still too cool for this and chooses to speak with an American accent instead.

Although now able to communicate with Jane and the others, Tarzan still refuses to take them to the gorillas, because he promised Kerchak not to. Clayton, who has spent most of the week shoving pictures of gorillas in Tarzan’s face and shouting at him, changes tactic and says that if he takes them to see them, then Jane can stay with him for longer. Hormones are the order of the day, so Tarzan gets Terk and Tantor to distract Kerchak for a while while he takes them there. The head ape is none too pleased on his return to find humans in his nest, and is remarkably restrained, simply accusing Tarzan of betraying the family and giving him a stern look. Tarzan takes off to ponder who he is, followed by a suspiciously silent Kala.

Burroughs version

Burroughs’ Tarzan also gets introduced to humans via the firing of a weapon. Specifically, a poisonous arrow that tears right through his mother.

http://picturebookreport.com/category/tarzan-of-the-apes/A tribe of natives, fresh on the march after a massacre (and subsequent banquet) of white people, have set up a new village near to the apes’ territory. The son of the chief has a hankering for ape meat, but Tarzan scares him away and later kills him in revenge and to swipe his arrows. The natives soon come to fear him as a vengeful spirit, as he makes a point of freaking them out whenever he steals from their village.

Tarzan’s first contact with the “civilised” human world is via the aforementioned cabin. He becomes fascinated by its books, completely disregarding the familiar human skeletons lying at his feet, and over the course of several years, he learns how to read. By the time he is 18 he can understand most of it and can even write simple sentences, but he can’t speak any of it. The books also tell him how to make a spear, fire arrows and lassoo things, so clearly the media is the cause of all things violent.

http://picturebookreport.com/category/tarzan-of-the-apes/

Nowadays it’s only Tarzan’s rope that dangles from trees.

The reason the Porters arrive this time is because of yet another ship mutiny; the professor was duped into an expensive treasure hunt, taking his daughter Jane, her helper, her admirer Clayton, and his friend Mr. Philander along, but as soon as the sailors neared their destination and got a sniff of the potential goods, they decided to turf them out and take off with the loot (or at least bury it further around the coast).

When Tarzan visits the cabin one day he finds it has been ransacked by this motley crew, and so leaves a note on the door telling them not to touch his stuff and about how much of a badass he is, signing it “Tarzan of the Apes”. He ingratiates himself with the “civilised” group by rescuing Clayton, Jane, and pretty much everyone at some point from either the jungle, an errant lion, or the cannibals. Despite seeing him in person on several occasions, the shore party doesn’t associate the “Tarzan of the Apes” in the letter with Tarzan himself until the very end of the book, because he’s obviously some other human that was abandoned on the shores of Africa and raised by apes.

Since the Disney Tarzan has never seen a human before, nor is he aware that he is one, his intrigue and instinct drive him to betray the one family he has ever known. He also seeks to understand rather than fight or hide from the intruders, learning about his kind’s history and one of its languages in record time. Conversely, Burroughs’ Tarzan was aware from a young age that he was different, and has already done some revision before the Porters arrive, teaching himself how to read and write over several years, as well as begin to wear some clothes. He takes it upon himself to look after and protect the newcomers, especially from the “lower” form of humans living near his troop. The change from ape to human seems gradual for both characters, so how does this manifest itself?

Tarzan the Man

Disney version

Thanks to Kerchak berating him and his mother, and his appearance, Tarzan has always suspected something was amiss. After the elephant stampede, he covers himself in mud to make himself look like a gorilla (P.C. sensors on stand by!), and asks Kala outright why he is different. She reminds him that he still has two hands, two feet and a heart, just like her, and that they are all the same. Well, Sabor did too (sniff).

It’s only after Tarzan’s betrayal that this issue raises its head again, so a sombre Kala takes Tarzan back to the tree house where she first found him. Just like a computer game, the dead bodies have since vanished, but Tarzan comes across a smashed photo frame of his parents and himself as a baby. Kala tells him she wants him to be happy, and then leaves him in the cabin with his thoughts.

You made Kala cry. You monster.

In a rather emotional scene, Tarzan signals his choice by emerging sometime later in his father’s clothes. Miraculously, rather than putting socks on his hands or  trousers over his head, he has managed to dress like a gentleman. He then gives Kala a hug and promises to remember her as his mother, but his mind is made up – he is going to leave with Jane and the other humans.

Burroughs version

This Tarzan’s epiphany comes not just from the cabin and its bounty of books, but when he is in the middle of a fight. For a change.

http://www.tomfloyd.net/drawing1.html

Image by Tom Floyd.

This takes place after Kerchak and Kala are dead, but before the Porters arrive. Terkoz, Tarzan’s step brother, has been enjoying a bout of lassie-bashing, and so Tarzan intervenes to defend the female. Rather than killing him, Tarzan realises the honourable thing to do is make him surrender, apologise, and then say no more about it. Although Terkoz agrees, Tarzan then says that he must find his own kind, because he no longer thinks like an ape. He goes off in search of the white men and on the way steals some clothing from the village to make himself look more civilised. Luckily he covers his bits before meeting Jane and the others.

His full transformation doesn’t take place until he rescues Lieutenant D’Arnot and they embark on their jungle trip together. D’Arnot teaches Tarzan how to speak French, but first has to teach him grammar in English, which isn’t his first language (welcome to my high school) and so takes longer than usual. However, this does mean they can both read Tarzan’s father’s diary and find out who he really is. On top of teaching him table manners and how to dress, D’Arnot arranges for Tarzan’s finger print to be matched with the baby’s print on Lord Greystoke’s diary, officially proving his lineage. By this point, the Porters have been and gone, but Tarzan is now in a state to go and find them in their natural habitat.

Disney’s Tarzan only finds out about his origin and the cabin when Kala’s hand is forced by the turn of events. He has always been aware that he is different, and once this has solidified, he decides to leave his gorilla family behind and join his own kind for good. Burroughs’ Tarzan knew that he was a human long before, but he doesn’t act to become a “proper” human until he decides to follow Jane; he wasn’t aware that she would be leaving, and seemed content to remain as her “forest god” protector. Both Tarzans have their work cut out for them in this department.

Rumble in the Jungle

Disney version

Unbeknownst to Tarzan, while he was introducing Jane and her father to his family, Clayton was scouting out the location of their nest. As Tarzan swings over the side of the boat to leave for England, he sees that Jane and Professor Porter have been captured, and that the ship’s crew are off to kidnap the gorillas and sell them off to various zoos. Realising humans suck as much as his decision, Tarzan manages to fight free with the help of Tantor, and they rush back to the gorilla nest to protect the troop.

Kerchak is shot down by Clayton, causing Tarzan to explode into a murderous rage and go for him, while dodging the odd bullet or three. After smashing his gun, Tarzan then tries to tangle him up with vines, but they are no match for the hunter’s knife, and after slicing in the wrong place he ends up hanging himself. The other crew members are chased away by the gorillas, but it’s too late for Kerchak, who finally recognises Tarzan as his son before expiring. Now the leader of his people, Tarzan knows he has to stay in the jungle with them, and that this is really where he belongs. Whoever said that power corrupts?

Burroughs version

While Tarzan’s time is mainly spent leading Professor Porter, Mr. Philander and Clayton back to the cabin like lost sheep, he occasionally dabbles in heroic rescues too. Jane is the most obvious victim (I’ll get to her next), but he also saves Lieutenant D’Arnot from the cannibals. He and his fleet of French officers had caught the mutineers, and while looking for Jane they were ambushed by natives. D’Arnot is carried off, but Tarzan flexes his “evil spirit” muscles and frightens them sufficiently in order to untie and carry him away to safety.

The remaining French officers regroup, and with a determined Clayton and resigned Professor Porter, they go back into the jungle to find Jane and any survivors from the attack. Once they find the village, they raise it to the ground and slaughter everyone except for the women and children who didn’t offer resistance. Let me repeat that; except the women and children who didn’t offer resistance. But they’re subhuman, so it’s all good.

By the time Tarzan and D’Arnot make it back to the cabin, Jane and the others have all been reunited and gone back to America. So, with the cannibal village wiped out, and most of his ape foes eradicated, Tarzan’s only enemies are now hundreds of miles of ocean and American social standing.

Disney have chosen a much simpler (and socially acceptable) villain; poachers and the illegal animal trade. This serves to remind Tarzan of where he belongs, and his role as protector of the family. Clayton is dispatched by a terrible but convenient accident, and the rest of the crew don’t seem to put up much of a fight after that. In the original story, the real threat comes from the cannibalistic savages, but Tarzan stops short of murdering them all, instead simply exploiting them. It’s the French officers who storm in and destroy the antagonists, whereas Tarzan spends more time looking after one of their victims. This reinforces how much more “civilised” he is, and how far the savages are beneath him.

Arguably Jane is the catalyst in both versions – Tarzan shows Clayton where the gorillas are so she can stay longer, and the French officers get ambushed while looking for her. Let’s now look at the differences between the lead couples.

Tarzan and Jane

Disney version

While sketching one baboon, Jane manages to anger an entire fleet of them and ends up running for her life. Fortunately, Tarzan has been peering at her through the trees and arrives in time to save her, getting a terrible rope burn on his hand that his feet have somehow avoided.

Once alone together, Jane is both anxious and intrigued by this wild man, who for some reason has a name that can be pronounced in English, despite only speaking in a series of “ook”s and “eek”s. This is Tarzan’s first proper contact with a human, and a female at that, so the intrigue is mutual, and he starts to visit her at the human camp.

Over the few days they are there, Jane and Tarzan become more attached to one another, and Tarzan shows her the ins and outs of his jungle home as Jane teaches him about her own. Unfortunately, time is short, as the boat has now arrived to signal the end of the gorilla expedition. Jane sincerely hopes Tarzan will come with her back to England, but the ape man is a bit of an indecisive hooligan and says no, then yes, and then no again, and asks her to stay with him instead.

“Our kids will look like this too, won’t they?”

Even when the business with Clayton is settled, and the ship’s crew develops amnesia (“We’re going to take the Porters safely home, right?”), Jane feels that she can’t stay with Tarzan because she needs to look after her father, and England is where she belongs. While on the boat leading back to the ship, however, the professor serves his only function in the film and tells Jane she must stay with Tarzan because she loves him. Jane flounders back to shore with a sudden change of heart, followed by the professor, who has now decided to play gooseberry and stay as well.

Tarzan and Jane are reunited with an awkward kiss followed by a better one, and then everyone changes into jungle-appropriate clothes before surfing along the branches together. The end.

Burroughs version

The first time Tarzan comes to Jane’s rescue she doesn’t see him, because she’s too busy fainting after failing to shoot Sabor. Tarzan is a bit reticent about meeting Jane outside the context of a rescue, so he contents himself with watching her through the cabin window at night and stealing a letter she has written to a friend. We discover from this that Jane’s father borrowed money for the treasure hunt from a chap named Robert Canler, and it’s implied that if he can’t pay him back, Jane will have to marry him against her will.

Another male giving Jane unwanted attention is Terkoz, but this message of interspecies tolerance doesn’t go down well with Tarzan, who lunges into action and fights him to the death. Miss Porter very nearly faints, and then allows Tarzan to carry her away into the jungle as her ovaries explode.

Despite appearances, the pair spend the night in a state of grace, partly due to Jane’s fear and because Tarzan realises that “real men” don’t take their mates by force like the apes do. In the morning, after bringing her food, he takes Jane back to the cabin, before which she kisses him and tells him she loves him. When it’s time to leave with the French officers, Jane writes Tarzan a note, inviting him to visit her in Baltimore, and asking him to also thank that nice wild man who saved her from the apes.

However, when Tarzan finally makes it to Baltimore, dressed as a gentleman and behaving as such, she only partly throws herself at him. Outside the jungle context, she doesn’t find him as intriguing, seeing Clayton as more suitable husband material. Although Tarzan saves her from marrying Canler by showing off his bling – the actual treasure they had been looking for, which he recovered – she accepts Clayton’s proposal on the side. Surprisingly, Tarzan keeps shtum, despite knowing that if he told them who he  was, Clayton would lose his fortune in one fell swoop, as he is really the next Lord Greystoke and would inherit everything.

The outcome of Tarzan and Jane’s romance therefore couldn’t be more different. Disney Jane realises she can find happiness with Tarzan and the apes, and finds him fascinating for more than the fact that he saved her life. Burroughs’ Jane, however, is a victim of primitive instinct while in the jungle, but in the cold light of day, cares more about her money and social standing and ends up marrying a man she kind of likes rather than the one she actually loves. It’s also Tarzan who ups sticks and changes his behaviour and wardrobe to find her, but even that’s not enough to impress her, the little tease.

Conclusion

The main themes to take away from the Disney version are “adoption yay!” and “nurture yay!”. Even though it’s important for Tarzan to acknowledge his roots, at the end of the day it’s the gorillas who raised him that are his real family. Both the humans and gorillas need to be tolerant of one another, and just like Tarzan and Jane, share their own experiences and worlds with each other (but maybe not bodily fluids). Life in the jungle is portrayed as a paradise, which has more of an appeal in modern times as people want to escape the rat race, and Sabor the leopard is made excessively vicious and almost demonic so that Disney can justify Tarzan killing another animal.

This is the utter opposite of the original, where the emphasis is on man conquering nature. Tarzan’s superiority, both over the apes and the natives, is constantly rammed down your throat, and at no point is the jungle or its surroundings portrayed as beautiful. Every non-human is treated as an enemy or a victim, and Tarzan must let go of his wild origins completely if he ever wishes to be accepted by human society. Even then, this gets in the way of his romance with Jane, who values social norms and her reputation over the man she once had an affinity with.

The Disney and Burroughs versions of Tarzan therefore present opposing sides of the “nature versus nurture” argument. Burroughs’ story makes Tarzan inherently aware of his superiority, which is why he cannot stay with the apes or remain in the wild where he grew up, and neither should he as it is most improper. Conversely, the Disney version shows that your family and loved ones make you who you are, and show you where you belong. They also suggest that harmony with nature, rather than conflict, is preferable, which could be why they gave their villain Tarzan’s real name – as a rejection of the decidedly less tolerant and violent nature of the original story and its protagonist. However, although both stories are a product of their time, what they both agree on is that if a man is raised by apes, he turns out to be even more awesome than usual.

Dress sense notwithstanding.

Sources

1)  Tarzan, 1999. Film.Directed by Chris Buck and Kevin Lima, U.S.A. Walt Disney Pictures.

2) Burroughs, Edgar Rice. Tarzan of the Apes. Ballantine Books, U.S.A., 1984. ISBN: 0-345-31977-X

3) http://www.edgarriceburroughs.ca/bio/ [online]

Posted in Disney vs. Original | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

My Top 5 Female Disney Characters

This is not me procrastinating, honest. I was just doing more research for the next post and realised there are some rather cool female Disney characters that don’t get shouted about all that often. And when I say “characters”, I actually mean it, as these ladies are more than just damsels in distress, if they are at all.

Apologies for the header image; apart from semi-pornographic/furry ones, the only other Disney female montages I could find were of all the classic princesses, who in my opinion are the antithesis of the following:

#5:

Mulan

From: Mulan

For all her clumsiness with makeup and dresses, Mulan is utterly fearless in the face of war, even though she doesn’t realise it. The risk of death at the hands of the enemy is clearly not enough – there’s also the risk of her being discovered as a woman. You’d think she’d be in a constant state of terror, but she only really breaks down when abandoned in the middle of the mountains after she has been found out. (Mind you, being stranded with a dragon voiced by Eddie Murphy would test anyone’s resolve.) Not for long though, as it’s soon off to save the emperor, no questions asked, and then back to her family to carry on as normal. This girl is the epitome of an inadvertent badass.

#4:

Megara (Meg)

From: Hercules

Despite being in danger an awful lot, Meg seems either non-plussed or vaguely irritated rather than a hysterical mess.  This could be because her soul is the property of Hades, and so technically she may not be able to die, but then again she has no qualms about teasing or back-talking said Lord of the Underworld. Due to ex-boyfriend issues she is a bit of a cynic, but this makes her more interesting and relatable, especially as she doesn’t let this jade her perception of love and friendship (in the end anyway), and would still risk her soul to save the one she loves. Ahh.

#3:

Nala

From: The Lion King

Nala is a nod to tomboys everywhere. She can hold her own in a fight, and is not the least bit squeamish, even when it comes to exploring a graveyard (an elephant’s in her case). As an adult, she has a strong sense of right and wrong, and makes no odds about having to leave behind her family to seek help, and then returning to Pride Rock to storm it with vastly outnumbered help. It’s also her rather than Simba that takes the initiative in continuing the circle of life, in perhaps the raunchiest scene Disney could get away with in a children’s film.

#2:

Princess Jasmine

From: Aladdin

It may be because she only has a tiger for a friend, but Princess Jasmine is fiery and determined and will not take crap from anyone – especially the arrogant suitors strutting through the palace gates or the creepy royal advisor, Jafar. She is arguably selfish though, in that she doesn’t really consider her family when trying to get what she wants. She is also relatively ruthless, running away from the palace despite being completely unprepared, and as a slave, throwing wine into the face of the most powerful sorceror in the world when he asks for her hand in marriage. Even when she has nothing left she will still try to fight for what she feels is right, and this would make her a very interesting monarch. Plus she has a pet tiger. Did I mention that?

#1:

Kala

From: Tarzan

Most mother figures in Disney films are either victims, absolutely perfect, or dead. Kala is none of these. She wrestles with the same leopard who killed her own baby in order to rescue Tarzan, and spends the rest of the film justifying his place in the troop to the leader, Kerchak, and even to Tarzan himself when he asks why he is different. However, she is still flawed in that she doesn’t tell Tarzan what he is or where he comes from until she is absolutely forced to, and this is equally because she wants to believe he is the same as everyone else, and because if she admits he is a human, he will want to leave with his own kind and she will lose another son. You can’t exactly blame her after her track record with offspring, but this inkling of selfishness makes Kala much more realistic and believable in my opinion. Kudos to Glenn Close for doing an awesome job with her voice acting too.

So there you have it, my favourite female Disney character is so far removed from the traditional princess that she isn’t even human.

Posted in Top 5s | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment